Argonne National Laboratory
Nuclear Engineering Division
Think, explore, discover, innovate
U.S. Department of Energy

Vulnerability Assessment Team (VAT)

About Seals

Seals are tamper-indicating devices (TIDs) used to detect and report unauthorized entry, and perhaps discourage it. Unlike intrusion or burglar alarms, seals report unauthorized entry after the fact. They must be inspected, either manually or electronically, to determine if unauthorized access has taken place.

A seal does not need to physically resist entry. (In other words, a seal is not a lock.) Indeed, some seals are made of paper or plastic and can be easily removed or cut off. Certain security products, known as "barrier seals" do provide a physical barrier to entry. These are hybrid devices --part lock and part seal. Barrier seals should be used with care. A barrier seal is often a compromise product, neither optimum as a lock or a seal. It's dual function tends to complicate issues about how to best use the product.

The effectiveness of seals is strongly dependent on the proper protocols for using them. These protocols are the official and unofficial procedures used for seal procurement, storage, record keeping, installation, inspection, removal, disposal, reporting, interpreting findings, and training. With a good protocol, a modest seal can provide excellent security. On the other hand, a sophisticated seal used poorly may be worse than useless if naively trusted.

Seals are categorized as passive or active, depending on whether they contain electronics. Passive seals are typically intended for one-time use. Most cost from a few cents per unit to a few dollars per unit. Dynamic seals are usually 10-100 times more expensive, but can usually be re-used many times. In choosing a seal, it is important to bear in mind that unit cost is not always the most important economic factor associated with using a seal, nor is cost necessarily well correlated with the level of security a seal can provide.

Number of different types of tamper-indicating devices (security seals) analyzed and defeated by the Vulnerability Assessment Team to date: 244+
The table  below shows a summary of defeat statistics for 244 different tamper-indicating seals.  The seal attacks were undertaken by one individual, well practiced in the attack, using only readily available low-tech tools, materials, and supplies. The marginal cost of an attack is the cost to attack another seal of the same design by reusing the attack tools and supplies. See also Defeating Existing Tamper-Indicating Seals.

Results for 244 Seals

Parameter

Mean

Median

defeat time for 1 person

1.4 mins

43 secs

cost of tools and supplies

$78

$5

marginal cost of attack

62¢

time to devise successful attack

2.3 hrs

12 mins

  • Half of these seals are in use for "critical" opportunities.
  • At least 19% are in use and under consideration for nuclear safeguards.

 

Contact:
Roger Johnston, Section Manager
National Security and Non-proliferation Department
Vulnerability Assessments Section
Fax:  +1 630-252-7323

VAT Resources

See also, under Current Projects:

VAT PAPERS

For a selection of VAT papers available upon request, see Publications.

For copies of the VAT papers and presentations on a wide variety of physical security issues (tags, seals, product counterfeiting, vulnerability assessments, RFIDs, GPS, nuclear safeguards), contact Roger Johnston at  

FEATURED MAXIM...

Physical Security Maxims

Contact Info

Roger Johnston, Manager
National Security and Non-proliferation Dept.
Vulnerability Assessments Section
Fax:  +1 630-252-7323

Jon Warner
National Security and Non-proliferation Dept.
Vulnerability Assessments Section
Fax:  +1 630-252-7323

Argonne Experts

Roger G. Johnston is one of the Experts featured in the Argonne Experts Guide.

YES, we are at the Argonne Open House!


ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY, Nuclear Engineering Division
9700 South Cass Ave., Argonne, IL 60439-4814
A U.S. Department of Energy laboratory managed by UChicago Argonne, LLC
 

Last modified on September 17, 2009 15:22 +0200