20150905, 04:59  #35 
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
7·11·127 Posts 
[offtopic]Hey, that guy was my colleague, we were in the same class at the university in '90/91, he was really brilliant in math, but a bit nerdie...
edit: his uncle was also teaching differential equations and partial derivatives there [/offtopic] Last fiddled with by LaurV on 20150905 at 05:05 
20150905, 08:57  #36  
Sep 2002
Database er0rr
111100010111_{2} Posts 
Apparently, LLR uses 3/2 as the seed, and this paper says one can use 1/4, but I see no proofs
Quote:
Edit: Found this one by Robert Gerbicz. So our years of Wagstaff PRP crunching was sound. Last fiddled with by paulunderwood on 20150905 at 09:23 

20150905, 10:42  #37  
Feb 2004
France
918_{10} Posts 
Quote:
See: Gerbicz and Vrba . Berrizbeitia's paper is 2010. But Melham's paper is 2008, final version received 2007, April 17. Melham first. Melham, Vrba, and I thought about the same LLT ideas and provided different proofs (with different seeds, but that is not an issue). Last fiddled with by T.Rex on 20150905 at 10:45 

20150905, 16:01  #38  
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
2×4,783 Posts 
Quote:
And of course, it is still totally unclear whom you were even talking about. [/offtopic] 

20150905, 16:14  #39  
Romulan Interpreter
Jun 2011
Thailand
7·11·127 Posts 
Quote:
(the name is in the link, but yet, if you google for the guys, "there can be only one", says the highlander...) 

Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Adding M(37156667) to OEIS  lidocorc  Information & Answers  1  20161211 07:26 
OEIS  A057732 : 2^n + 3  T.Rex  Miscellaneous Math  40  20150915 14:01 
OEIS  A059242 : 2^n+5 , n odd  T.Rex  Miscellaneous Math  7  20150828 18:04 
my misunderstanding of the OEIS  science_man_88  Miscellaneous Math  11  20110518 15:04 